An immunogenic and oncogenic feature-based classification for chemotherapy plus PD-1 blockade in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Although chemotherapy plus PD-1 blockade (chemo+anti-PD-1) has become the standard first-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), reliable biomarkers for this regimen are lacking. Here we perform whole-exome sequencing on tumor samples from 486 patients of the JUPITER-06 study and develop a copy number alteration-corrected tumor mutational burden that depicts immunogenicity more precisely and predicts chemo+anti-PD-1 efficacy. We identify several other favorable immunogenic features (e.g., HLA-I/II diversity) and risk oncogenic alterations (e.g., PIK3CA and TET2 mutation) associated with chemo+anti-PD-1 efficacy. An esophageal cancer genome-based immuno-oncology classification (EGIC) scheme incorporating these immunogenic features and oncogenic alterations is established. Chemo+anti-PD-1 achieves significant survival improvements in EGIC1 (immunogenic feature-favorable and oncogenic alteration-negative) and EGIC2 (either immunogenic feature-favorable or oncogenic alteration-negative) subgroups, but not the EGIC3 subgroup (immunogenic feature-unfavorable and oncogenic alteration-positive). Thus, EGIC may guide future individualized treatment strategies and inform mechanistic biomarker research for chemo+anti-PD-1 treatment in patients with advanced ESCC.

Toripalimab plus chemotherapy in treatment-naïve, advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (JUPITER-06): A multi-center phase 3 trial.

Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). In this phase 3 study (ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT03829969), 514 patients with treatment-naïve advanced ESCC were randomized (1:1) to receive toripalimab or placebo in combination with paclitaxel plus cisplatin (TP) every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles, followed by toripalimab or placebo maintenance. At the prespecified final analysis of progression-free survival (PFS), a significant improvement in PFS is observed for the toripalimab arm over the placebo arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.46-0.74; p < 0.0001). The prespecified interim analysis of overall survival (OS) also reveals a significant OS improvement for patients treated with toripalimab plus TP over placebo plus TP (HR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.43-0.78; p = 0.0004). The incidences of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events are similar between the two arms. Toripalimab plus TP significantly improves PFS and OS in patients with treatment-naïve, advanced ESCC, with a manageable safety profile.

Clinical and biomarker analyses of sintilimab versus chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized, open-label phase 2 study (ORIENT-2).

This randomized, open-label, multi-center phase 2 study (NCT03116152) assessed sintilimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, versus chemotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after first-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), while exploratory endpoint was the association of biomarkers with efficacy. The median OS in the sintilimab group was significantly improved compared with the chemotherapy group (median OS 7.2 vs.6.2 months; P = 0.032; HR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.97). Incidence of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3-5 was lower with sintilimab than with chemotherapy (20.2 vs. 39.1%). Patients with high T-cell receptor (TCR) clonality and low molecular tumor burden index (mTBI) showed the longest median OS (15.0 months). Patients with NLR < 3 at 6 weeks post-treatment had a significantly prolonged median OS (16.6 months) compared with NLR ≥ 3. The results demonstrate a significant improvement in OS of sintilimab compared to chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic ESCC.

The Real-World Practice of Fruquintinib for Chinese Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: In FRESCO trial, a phase III study of fruquintinib demonstrated a significant improvement on the overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who failed to response to available standard treatments. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of fruquintinib in Chinese mCRC patients in the real-world setting. METHODS: Patients with mCRC treated with fruquintinib at our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, treatment, adverse events and survival data were collected. OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: In total, 76 patients were evaluated from December 2018 to January 2020. The median (range) age was 59.5 (34-86) years, ECOG PS 0-1/2 was 86.8%/13.2%, and 38 (50%)/30 (39.5%) patients had experienced more than two prior therapies for mCRC. The median treatment duration was 3.6 cycles. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) resulted in dose reduction were 17.1% of the patients without any treatment discontinuation. The most common grade 3 or 4 TRAEs were hypertension (9.2%), hand-foot skin reaction (7.9%), thrombocytopenia (3.9%), anaemia (2.6%), increased ALT (1.3%), oral mucositis (1.3%), proteinuria (1.3%) and neutropenia (1.3%). The median PFS was 5.1 months (95% CI 3.8-6.4 months), and the median OS was 12.0 months (95% CI 8.0-16.1 months). In patients with hypertension or hypothyroidism, a survival extension approximate to 6 months was observed, but the difference is not yet statistically significant. CEA decreased after fruquintinib treatment could be considered as a potential predictor for better OS. CONCLUSION: The outcome of this real-life study was consistent with that of the randomised controlled trial. There were no new safety concerns. Future studies of fruquintinib should be conducted to identify patients who tend to obtain more benefits from fruquintinib alone or in combination with other agents.

Donafenib Versus Sorafenib in First-Line Treatment of Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Controlled Phase II-III Trial.

PURPOSE: Donafenib, a novel multikinase inhibitor and a deuterated sorafenib derivative, has shown efficacy in phase Ia and Ib hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) studies. This study compared the efficacy and safety of donafenib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy for advanced HCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This open-label, randomized, parallel-controlled, multicenter phase II-III trial enrolled patients with unresectable or metastatic HCC, a Child-Pugh score ≤ 7, and no prior systemic therapy from 37 sites across China. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral donafenib (0.2 g) or sorafenib (0.4 g) twice daily until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), tested for noninferiority and superiority. Efficacy was primarily assessed in the full analysis set (FAS), and safety was assessed in all treated patients. RESULTS: Between March 21, 2016, and April 16, 2018, 668 patients (intention-to-treat) were randomly assigned to donafenib and sorafenib treatment arms; the FAS included 328 and 331 patients, respectively. Median OS was significantly longer with donafenib than sorafenib treatment (FAS; 12.1 v 10.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.831; 95% CI, 0.699 to 0.988; P = .0245); donafenib also exhibited superior OS outcomes versus sorafenib in the intention-to-treat population. The median progression-free survival was 3.7 v 3.6 months (P = .0570). The objective response rate was 4.6% v 2.7% (P = .2448), and the disease control rate was 30.8% v 28.7% (FAS; P = .5532). Drug-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in significantly fewer patients receiving donafenib than sorafenib (125 [38%] v 165 [50%]; P = .0018). CONCLUSION: Donafenib showed superiority over sorafenib in improving OS and has favorable safety and tolerability in Chinese patients with advanced HCC, showing promise as a potential first-line monotherapy for these patients.

Promising Immunotherapy in Metastatic Testicular Sex Cord Stromal Tumours After First-Line Chemotherapy.

Background: Testicular sex cord stromal tumours (TSCSTs) are rare, with few studies focusing on the metastatic TSCST prognosis. The value of treatments, including radical orchiectomy (RO) and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), in preventing metastasis is controversial. Additionally, metastatic TSCSTs are resistant to chemotherapy. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of immunotherapy in metastatic TSCSTs after first-line chemotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively screened patients with testicular tumours undergoing testis surgery between January 2005 and January 2019. Patients with TSCSTs who had undergone testis-sparing surgery (TSS) or RO were identified. The malignant type was defined as metastasis confirmed by pathology. Treatment responses, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety were analysed. Results: Among the 494 testicular tumour patients who received TSS or RO, 11 (2.2%) patients with histologically proven TSCSTs were identified. At the last follow-up, 7 patients survived without tumours, and 4 patients developed metastasis and received first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy, with 1 of them achieving an objective response. Their PFS times were 1.5, 2.2, 9.0, and 17.0 months, respectively. Two patients received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after developing chemotherapy resistance and achieved a partial response up to the last follow-up; one of them experienced Grade 1 adverse events, and the other experienced Grade 2 adverse events during immunotherapy. The median OS time of the 4 patients with metastatic TSCSTs was 32 months. Conclusions: TSCSTs are rare, and most are benign with a good prognosis. ICIs represent a promising option for improving clinical outcomes in metastatic TSCSTs.

Comparison of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) as adjuvant chemotherapies for stage II and III gastric cancer after D2 resection: A single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) as adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer (GC) reduces cancer recurrence and improves survival. S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) is well-tolerated and effective against advanced GC, and also be used widely in adjuvant treatment. However, data comparing SOX and XELOX as adjuvant treatments are lacking. METHOD: Data on treatment modalities, adverse events, recurrence and metastasis were collected from 180 patients with stage II and III GC, who received SOX or XELOX after D2 gastrectomy between January 2012 and December 2015, and analyzed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate. RESULTS: Median follow was 52.9 months; 3-year DFS rate and overall survival (OS) rate were 75.2% and 67.6% (P = 0.359) and 81.2% and 83.3% (P = 0.77) in the SOX and XELOX groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in peritoneal metastasis rates in the SOX and XELOX groups (8.6% vs 15%, respectively; P = 0.232). Compound recurrent disease was associated with significantly shorter OS. Multivariate analysis identified metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR) as an independent prognostic factor for OS (P = 0.036; hazard ratio = 2.875; 95% confidence interval, 1.069-7.729); the LNR ≥17% group had inferior 3-year OS rate to the LNR <17% group (P = 0.001). The incidence of grades 3 and 4 adverse events was similar in both groups; however, grade ≥2 hand-foot syndrome was significantly less frequent in the SOX group (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: SOX has similar survival benefits to XELOX and is well-tolerated in Chinese patients with GC following D2 gastrectomy.

Outcome of chemotherapy with or without targeted agents in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with deficient DNA mismatch repair: A single center, cohort study.

AIMS: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) is a rare disease accounting only for 4-5% of the whole mCRC and its optimal treatment still remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the outcome of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab or cetuximab in this setting. METHODS: A total of 729 colorectal cancer patients with dMMR status were screened for eligibility. The Kaplan-Meier method, the log-rank test and Cox analysis were utilized for survival analyses. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients met the inclusion criteria and enrolled in the study. The median overall survival (OS) of entire cohort was 21.7 months. Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group exhibited a tendency of substantially higher overall response rate (ORR) than chemotherapy alone group (63.6% vs. 23.8%, P = 0.053), whereas the ORR between chemotherapy plus cetuximab group and chemotherapy alone group were similar (28.6% vs. 23.8%, P = 1.000). Compared with chemotherapy alone group, bevacizumab combined group achieved a significantly longer progression-free survival (10.0 months vs. 4.8 months, P = 0.028), whereas cetuximab combined group was not (6.8 months vs. 4.8 months, P = 0.158). Although the median OS seemed to favor bevacizumab combined group, no significant differences were detected between the three arms (33.7, 21.7 and 15.3 months, respectively; P = 0.345). Prognostic analysis showed that primary tumor resection was the positive prognostic factor of OS (hazards ratio: 0.438; P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: dMMR mCRC seems resistant to chemotherapy and cetuximab. Bevacizumab combined therapy shows a sign of potentially favorable outcome in this subtype.

Nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 as first-line followed by S-1 maintenance for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a single-arm phase II trial.

PURPOSE: We conducted a single-arm prospective phase II study to determine the efficacy and safety of the first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel and S-1 followed by S-1 maintenance therapy. METHODS: Nab-paclitaxel was administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 at 120 mg/m2. S-1 at 120 mg/day (for surface area ≥ 1.5 m2), 100 mg/day (for surface area between 1.25-1.5 m2), and 80 mg/day (for surface area < 1.25 m2) were given two times daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks. Patients who achieved response and stable disease after 6 cycles were given S-1 maintenance treatment in the same schedule until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity developed. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Between 01/2015 and 07/2017, 32 patients were enrolled. RESULTS: The ORR in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (N = 32) was 53.1%, and the DCR was 87.5%. In the 30 evaluable patients, the ORR and DCR were 56.7 and 93.3%, respectively. The median follow-up time was 18 (range 12-36) months, the median PFS was 6.2 (range 4.4-8) months, and the median OS was 13.6 (range 8.7-18.5) months. The incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia was 27.6%. Other grade 3 adverse events included 1 (3.1%) hand-foot syndrome, 1 (3.1%) rash and 2 (6.3%) diarrheas. CONCLUSIONS: Nab-paclitaxel and S-1 regimen has presented encouraging ORR, OS, and manageable toxicities as first-line therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.

UGT1A1*6, UGT1A7*3 and UGT1A9*1b polymorphisms are predictive markers for severe toxicity in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancer treated with irinotecan-based regimens.

Irinotecan-induced severe neutropenia and diarrhea, which remain unpredictable, has restrained the dose and clinical efficiency of irinotecan administration. In the present study, a total of 70 irinotecan-treated patients with histologically confirmed metastatic gastrointestinal cancer were enrolled. Despite genotyping well-reported alleles, direct sequencing was specifically adopted to avoid ethnic heterogeneity and to identify novel variations. The promoter (-1000 bp) and exon 1 regions of UDP glucuronosyltransferase family 1 member A complex locus (UGT1A1) gene family members UGT1A1, UGT1A7 and UGT1A9 were sequenced, and comprehensive analysis of their genetic polymorphisms was performed to determine the association between inherited genetic variations and irinotecan-induced toxicity. A total of 23 different genetic variants were detected in the present study, including 2 novel polymorphisms. The results of the present study revealed that UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A7*3 are risk factors for irinotecan-induced severe neutropenia, and UGT1A9*1b is associated with severe diarrhea. These results may provide biomarkers for the selection of the optimal chemotherapy for Chinese patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancer.

A study on the association between hyperlipidemia and hypothyroidism and the response to TKIs in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

AIM: Vascular endothelial growth facto receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) are widely used for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the response to VEGFR-TKIs and hyperlipidemia and hypothyroidism. METHODS: Clinical data on 155 patients with mRCC treated with VEGFR-TKIs at the Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from 2006 to 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received first-line TKI therapy. Survival analysis was performed with a significance level of 0.05 using a Kaplan-Meier curve. The χ(2) test was used for the intergroup comparison. The Cox regression model was used for the analysis of multiple factors affecting survival. RESULTS: The median survival for the whole group (n = 155) was 36.2 months. A total of 57 patients (36.8 percent) developed hypothyroidism and 85 patients (54.9 percent) experienced hyperlipidemia. The response rate (RR) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) for patients with normal thyroid function were 32.7 percent and 9.1 months, respectively, 54.5 percent and 13.7 months with grade I hypothyroidism, 70.8 percent and 23.8 months with grade II hypothyroidism (P values of 0.001 and 0.017, respectively). The RR and mPFS for patients with normal blood lipids were 23.9 percent and 8.0 months, respectively, 54.0 percent and 12.9 months with grade I hyperlipidemia, 60.7 percent and 14.0 months with grade II hyperlipidemia, and 100.0 percent and 22.2 months with grade III hyperlipidemia. Significant differences in the RR and mPFS were seen between groups (the P values were 0.000 and 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSION: Hypothyroidism or hyperlipidemia may be effective predictive factors for response to treatment with VEGFR-TKIs in mRCC patients. Large-sample studies are warranted to further prove these results.

Impact of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy on Survival in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated by Targeted Therapy.

BACKGROUND: The metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy combined with α-interferon yields additional overall survival (OS) benefits. It is unclear whether mRCC patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI) will benefit from such cytoreductive nephrectomy either. The aim of the study was to identify variables for selection of patients who would benefit from upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy for mRCC treated with VEGFR-TKI. METHODS: Clinical data on 74 patients enrolled in 5 clinical trials conducted in Cancer Hospital (Institute), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 2006 to January 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. The survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons between patient groups were performed by Chi-square test. A Cox regression model was adopted for analysis of multiple factors affecting survival, with a significance level of α = 0.05. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy followed by targeted therapy (cytoreductive nephrectomy group) and 23 patients were treated with targeted therapy alone (noncytoreductive nephrectomy group). The median OS was 32.2 months and 23.0 months in cytoreductive nephrectomy and noncytoreductive nephrectomy groups, respectively (P = 0.041). Age ≤45 years (P = 0.002), a low or high body mass index (BMI <19 or >30 kg/m2) (P = 0.008), a serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) concentration >1.5 × upper limit of normal (P = 0.025), a serum calcium concentration >10 mg/ml (P = 0.034), and 3 or more metastatic sites (P = 0.023) were independent preoperative risk factors for survival. The patients only with 0-2 risk factors benefited from upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy in terms of OS when compared with the patients treated with targeted therapy alone (40.0 months vs. 23.2 months, P = 0.042), while those with more than 2 risk factors did not. CONCLUSIONS: Five risk factors (age, BMI, LDH, serum calcium, and number of metastatic sites) seemed to be helpful for selecting patients who would benefit from undergoing upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy.

Body mass index and age are additional prognostic factors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

PURPOSE: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the preferred treatment drugs for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The aim of this study was to analyze prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in patients with mRCC treated with TKIs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical data on 155 patients enrolled in 5 clinical trials conducted at our hospital from 2006 to 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. All patients received first-line TKI therapy (sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, or famitinib). Survival rates were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median OS (mOS) was 36.2 months. A total of 4 of the 5 adverse prognostic factors identified by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) were found to be independent predictors of shorter survival, anemia, hypercalcemia, lactate dehydrogenase>1.5×upper limit of normal, and diagnosis to treatment time<1 year. In addition, we found that age≤45 years (P = 0.002), low or high body mass index ([BMI]<19 or>30kg/m(2)) (P = 0.003), and presence of≥3 metastatic sites (P = 0.000) were also independent adverse prognostic factors. According to the MSKCC model, the mOS time in the favorable-risk, intermediate-risk, and poor-risk groups were 46.6, 30.4 and 16.7 months, respectively (P = 0.005). When we integrated age and BMI into the MSKCC model to set up a 7-factor prognostic model, we found the mOS time for these 3 groups was 71.1, 41.6 and 15.3 months, respectively (P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Age and BMI are additional independent prognostic factors for patients with mRCC receiving vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted TKI treatment, and the MSKCC prognostic model is also applicable to them. A 7-factor prognostic model might help to identify patients with the best prognosis. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

XELIRI compared with FOLFIRI as a second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety and survival rate of a treatment regimen comprising capecitabine plus irinotecan (XELIRI) to those of a standard regimen comprising leucovorin, fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI), to determine the correlation among the inherited genetic variations in UGT1A1, UGT1A7 and UGT1A9. A total of 84 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were included in the study. All patients were treated with FOLFIRI or XELIRI. The median progression-free survival time was 4.4 months for FOLFIRI and 5.7 months for XELIRI (hazard ratio=1.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-2.21; P=0.22). When compared with FOLFIRI (6.34%), XELIRI was associated with lower rates of severe toxicity (3.29) (P=0.026) and similar disease control rates (69.57% for FOLFIRI and 61.11% for XELIRI; P=0.49). In total, 17 single nucleotide polymorphisms were identified, five of which revealed an association with grade 3/4 neutropenia, including UGT1A7*4; however, UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6, which have been previously reported, were not significant. Additionally, H2 haplotypes, which include UGT1A9*22, and H5 and H7 haplotypes, which include UGT1A7*2, UGT1A7*3 and UGT1A7*4, were associated with a higher risk of severe neutropenia. In conclusion, XELIRI is an effective treatment regimen with acceptable response rates and tolerability for mCRC patients as a second-line treatment. Furthermore, inherited genetic variations in UGT1A1, UGT1A7 and UGT1A9 are associated with grade 3/4 neutropenia.

An open-labeled, randomized, multicenter phase IIa study of gambogic acid injection for advanced malignant tumors.

BACKGROUND: Gambogic acid is a pure active compound isolated from the traditional Chinese medicinal plant gamboge (Garcinia morella Desv.). Based on the preliminary results of a phase I study, this phase IIa study compared the efficacy and safety of different dosage schedules of gambogic acid in patients with advanced malignant tumors. METHODS: Patients with advanced or metastases cancer who had not received any effective routine conventional treatment or who had failed to respond to the existing conventional treatment were randomly assigned to receive either 45 mg/m(2) gambogic acid intravenously from Days 1 to 5 of a 2-week cycle (Group A), or 45 mg/m(2) every other day for a total of five times during a 2-week cycle (Group B). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Twenty-one patients assigned to Group A and 26 to Group B were included in the final analysis. The ORRs were 14.3% in Group A and 0% in Group B. It was not possible to analyze the significant difference because one of the values was zero. The disease control rates (DCRs) were 76.2% in Group A and 61.5% in Group B (P = 0.0456). The observed adverse reactions were mostly Grades I and II, and occurred in most patients after administration of the trial drug. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results of this phase IIa exploratory study suggest that gambogic acid has a favorable safety profile when administered at 45 mg/m(2). The DCR was greater in patients receiving gambogic acid on Days 1 - 5 of a 2-week cycle, but the incidence of adverse reactions was similar irrespective of the administration schedule.

[Phase II clinical trial of docetaxel, platinum and S-1 for advanced gastric cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety profile and to explore the role of docetaxel, S-1 plus cisplatin (DCS) or oxaliplatin (DOS) in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 45 patients with advanced gastric cancer were recruited. They received DCS or DOS at the discretion of investigators. Docetaxel was given intravenously at the dose of 60 mg/m² at d1, S-1 60 mg×m⁻²×d⁻¹ or 80 - 120 mg/d according to individual patient's area of body surface orally from d1 to d14 and cisplatin 30 mg/m² at d1, d2 or oxaliplatin 111 - 127 (median: 117) mg/m ²at d2. Each cycle was for 21 days. RESULTS: Forty-three patients received ≥ 1 complete cycle of DCS/DOS with a median cycle number of 5(range: 1 - 8). Among 42 patients evaluated for efficacy, the outcomes were partial response (n = 28), stable disease (n = 9) and progression (n = 5). The response rate was 66.7%. Progression-free survival (PFS) of 32 patients on chemotherapy alone was 7.1 months and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached. The most common grade 3/4 adverse effects included neutropenia (46.5%), thrombocytopenia (9.3%), vomiting (9.3%), nausea (7.0%) and diarrhea (4.7%). Ten of fourteen patients with advanced unresectable gastric cancer without clinically detectable distant metastases underwent surgical resection after a median of 4 (2-6) cycles of DCS or DOS and 9 (64.3%) had R0 resection. CONCLUSIONS: DCS/DOS is effective for advanced gastric cancer and in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. And the toxicities of DCS/DOS are manageable.

Phase II clinical study on the modified DCF regimen for treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: A phase III trial involving docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer was shown to have superior efficacy compared to cisplatin and fluorouracil alone, but with a high rate of hematologic toxicity. To reduce toxicity while maintaining the efficacy of DCF, we reduced the doses of docetaxel (D) and cis-platinum (CDDP), and administered 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) via a continuous intravenous (CIV) infusion. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with gastric adenocarcinomas received D (60 mg/m(2) 1 hour on day 1), CDDP (30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2), and 5-FU (1500 mg×m(-2)×24 h(-1) CIV on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was the response rate. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were enrolled. Based on the efficacy evaluation following at least 2 cycles of treatment, there was 7.1% complete remission (CR), 71% partial remission (PR), 14% stable disease (NC/SD), and 7.1% progressive disease (PD). The median survival time was 13 months. Nine patients (64%) had grade III-IV neutropenia, and 4 patients (29%) had grade IV neutropenia, among whom 1 had grade IV neutropenia with grade III nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSION: The modified DCF regimen is highly active and has a favorable toxicity profile in Chinese patients with gastric cancer.

[Factors affecting the sensitivity of EGFR-TKI treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical factors affecting the sensitivity of EGFR-TKI treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: Clinical data were retrospective analyzed to determine the clinical factors affecting the outcome of 166 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who received EGFR-TKI treatment in our hospttal from January of 2005 to December of 2006. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients benefited from EGFR-TKI treatment in the total of 166 patients and the disease control rate was 71.7%. Among the factors analyzed, sex, age, smoking, pathological type, brain and bone metastasis or not when EGFR-TKI was used, the time using EGFR-TKI and the level of LDH at the time of diagnosis had no significant effect on the clinical benefit rate. Among the 126 patients with serum CEA assayed at diagnosis, 84 cases had a higher serum CEA level. Compared with the patients with normal serum CEA level, the patients with a higher serum CEA level benefited more easily from EGFR-TKI therapy, with a disease control rate of 79.8% and 59.5%, respectively (P = 0.016). Among the patients who got benefits from EGFR-TKI treatment, smoking and the CEA level at diagnosis had effects on the duration of progression-free survival. The progression free survivals were 9.57 ± 6.75 months in non-smokers, 4.86 ± 3.44 months in light-smokers and 5.25 ± 4.34 months in heavy-smokers (P = 0.007). The progression free survival was 9.45 ± 7.48 months in the group with a higher serum CEA level and 6.52 ± 4.46 months in the group with normal serum CEA level (P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR-TKIs treatment is safe and effective. The patients with high CEA level are prone to benefit from it.

[Analysis of chemotherapeutic efficacy after a failed regimen of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the treatment efficacy after a failed regimen of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted for 87 patients with advanced NSCLC at our hospital from January of 2005 to December of 2006. All subjects received chemotherapy after a failure of EGFR-TKI, there were 37 cases of male and the median age was 56 ± 11 (range, 31 - 76) years, 50 cases of female, median age 56 ± 13 (range, 31 - 78) years; They received a 2-drug combination chemotherapy (n = 61) and a monodrug chemotherapy (n = 26). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). And the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and side effects. RESULTS: The OS was 9.4 ± 6.0 (range, 2-33) months and ORR 9.2% (8/87). The OS was 9.1 ± 5.2 (range, 2 - 31) months in combination chemotherapy group and 10.0 ± 7.3 (range, 3 - 33) months in monodrug group; the ORRs were 11.5% (7/61) and 3.8% (1/26) respectively in two groups. There was no significant difference in OS and ORR between two groups (P > 0.05). The common side effects were myelosuppression and nausea/vomiting. The rate of myelosuppression was 87.4% (76/87) and that of 3/4 grade myelosuppression 33.3% (29/87). And the rate of nausea/vomiting was 86.2% (75/87) and that of 3/4 grade nausea/vomiting 10.3% (9/87). Other side effects were mild and well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: If tolerated, chemotherapy after an EGFR-TKI failure may prolong the survival in advanced NSCLC patients.